128cm love doll Relevant Information
(94 People Likes) What is the meaning of the Hole (Courtney Love) song, "Doll Parts"?
t a woman who is being objectified as a collection of her body parts and feels bad about herself and her ability to be in a loving relationship. Probably stemming from her real life herion addiction and her up and down relationship with Kurt Cobain She also wants the most cake, she wants to be a real winner at life and not a fake loser trying to get by. Personally I think Celebraty Skin is the best track on that al
(49 People Likes) Should we give pedophiles children sex dolls to satisfy their sexuality? Will there be less sexual abuse of children?
’m going to establish some facts and personal background before actually answering it. I am a victim of childhood abuse, both by confirmed pedophiles and abusers who abuse children. I’ve written about this extensively and some of the writing is in my profile. I am not a pedophile or anyone who has or would ever sexually abuse children. Pedophilia, or a sexual attraction to prepubescent children, is something that some people are, although estimates of exact percentages vary. It isn’t something someone chooses to be, it can’t be conditioned into them or out of them. It’s very likely, given what we know, that some people are simply born pedophiles and there is nothing to be done about that. Most sexual abuse of children is not perpetrated by pedophiles, but garden variety abusers who target children because children are easy victims. Now that we have that out of the way, let’s look at the goals here. The problem with our society presently when it comes to pedophiles is that we simply demonize anyone who is a pedophile. They make a great punching bag because anyone who is attracted to children is obviously a bad person, right? The fact that they can’t help their attraction is completely ignored and we lump people who are pedophiles but don’t actually act on it in any way (including in viewing child pornography) in with those that do. Because of that stigma around pedophiles, there isn’t a lot of solid research on it and what research there is heavily depends on offending pedophiles as subjects. Pedophiles who don’t offend rarely take part in studies because of the stigma around being a pedophile, so we have a limited sample size. As a society when it comes to dealing with pedophiles, the goal is and should be simply the reduction of harm to children. In other words, the goal should be whatever it takes so that less children are abused. If you look at it from that perspective, the answer when it comes to sex dolls that look like prepubescent children, is that if in the end it reduces harm to actual children, we should allow them. As for whether or not they actually reduce harm to children, we simply don’t have enough data to say one way or the other. Evidence seems to suggest that it does make a pedophile less likely to offend if they have access to some kind of way to relieve themselves sexually like with a doll. There isn’t any evidence to suggest any kind of escalation of activity like using a doll would make someone more likely to abuse children. Similar to how massive amounts of evidence shows that people who play violent video games are actually less likely to be violent in real life and as porn use goes up people are less likely to commit sexual assault, we can extrapolate that people are less likely to act on their urges with a real child if they have some kind of ethical outlet. The main way the pedophiles who do offend actually end up offending is by viewing and collecting child pornography. This hurts children and is wrong as well because you need to abuse real children to produce it. So having an outlet that doesn't abuse children would make all of those pedophiles that fall into the trap of child pornography less likely to actually do that. This leads us to the logical conclusion as well, where if we could create child pornography without hurting children, would that be allowed as well? As animation gets better, this might someday be possible. These are thorny ethical issues that must be addressed. The thing is, personally it bothers me and disgusts me. The idea of someone using a sex doll that looks like a child and watching animated porn of people having sex with children Is repulsive (and personally triggering to me). However, we have to remember that we have a goal in mind here and that goal is: fewer children molested and harmed. So if something that bothers and disgusts us but doesn't hurt any children will make it so that less actual children are harmed, I’m all for it. So in terms of whether or not they should be illegal I am leaning towards no. They should be allowed and we should do more scientific studies to make sure they actually do what we hope they do: make pedophiles less likely to offend. I would probably be in favor of them being prescribed by a psychiatrist or something like that, who would monitor the person using them and make sure they weren’t going to hurt a real child. However, this is outside of my wheelhouse. Do they encourage and normalize a cultural climate that condones child molestation and pedophila? Why or why not? It would in no way create something that condones child molestation. There is no slippery slope here. This has been brought up in countless other industries. Do movies and games that show violence condone real violence? All evidence points to no. In fact, healthy humans are able to separate fantasy from reality and that’s why we are able to enjoy fantastical things that we would never condone in reality. There is strong evidence to suggest that having these fantasies prevents people from doing immoral things in real life. This is why rape fantasies are okay, but real rape isn’t. It goes on and on. As far as normalizing and condoning pedophilia, we need to normalize it in that we need to recognize that pedophilia or people who are pedophiles are normal and that they exist. We need to normalize their sexuality and help them not act on it. This is very important. Normalizing sexual abuse of children is not something we should ever do (and again, no evidence to suggest that child sex dolls do that). Normalizing pedophiles acknowledging their attractions and getting help to prevent them from hurting children is something we need to do. Summary: As someone who has been sexually abused as a child, I am willing to support anything that prevents another child from being sexually abused. If that means sanctioning and providing child s
(55 People Likes) Do gold prices always go up during a recession?
nts of gold, months, sometimes years into the future. Overall, the price of gold is pretty stable. Most of the time. A look at historical prices would reveal that the biggest moves in gold come when the value of the dollar declines. If you look at the period between 2002 and 2008 - roughly speaking - you’d find that the price of gold skyrocketed from about $300/ounce to over $1,200/ounce, and actually reached a high of about $1,900 before crashing. During the same period, the value of the dollar on world markets, as measured or indicated by DXY, which is the symbol for the dollar index which compares the value of the US Dollar to a basket of six other world currencies, went down by 45%. Not coincidentally, when gold prices quadrupled, so too did crude. Most of these moves were in response to the declining dollar. If you compared the price of either gold or crude to their price in the currency of their country(ies)-or-origin you’d find that their price didn’t change all that much; any price changes in local currencies were probably due to speculation. If you go back to the Reagan era, another period o class="nturl" style="color: red">mini sex doll rising gold prices, you’d find much the same thing, the rapid, and significant decline in the value of the US Dollar that raised gold prices significantly, the high being about $800/ounce or so. Gold and crude went down in price under Obama? No surprise; the dollar went back up some 45% during Obama’s administration. Gold prices have varied by less than $100/ounce since Trump? Again, not too surprising considering that the USD has traded in a narrow range, from DXY 102 down to perhaps 92 or so. Recession by itself does not necessarily trigger any mad rush to gold. The real migration of money during the lead-up to a recession, which generally includes the “smart money” getting out of the stock market, seems to be into US Treasuries. Price of treasuries and their yield or interest rate are inversely proportional, inextricably linked, and when treasuries are in demand, their price goes up, and interest rates go down. If you look at a chart of TNX (or maybe $TNX, depending on the charting service), which is a tracking index for the interest rate on 10-year treasuries, you’ll find that prior to the stock collapse, TNX had reached a high of about 3.25%, and since the stock market collapse, has fallen back below 3.0% (TNX, btw will show interest-times-ten, so “30” means an interest rate of 3.0%). Gold carries premiums that most investors want to avoid. To buy the actual metal you may pay as much as a 10% premium above gold prices, not just for gold coins, but also gold bars as well. And when you want to sell that physical gold, you get smacked by another premium, as much as 10% again. You could just buy the gold-tracking ETF, GLD and avoid all the hassle of holding the actual metal, and be financially, far better off. But, to answer the question posed (again), a recession by itself is not going to sent the price of gold up enough to cover those onerous purchase and sales commissions, which could require that gold rise by 20% before you even break even. Gold as an investment, as has been shown numerous times, just doesn't perform that well; it generally lags the S
(88 People Likes) Finding a cheap sex doll is not easy,
cheap sex doll is not easy, and finding a doll that is not a cheap fake copy is even harder. Cheapest sex dolls if you count out torsos and other air-filled things the remind a doll that has nothing to do with a realistic real sex doll, start from maybe 500 dollars. Typically, those are made from bad materials, low build quality and even hazardous materials. After all, it is a hygiene product and your safety should be one concern. So s
(48 People Likes) Why does Candace Owens and other traditionalist women say”bring back manly men” but never”bring back sex doll-like women (aka, feminine women)”? Do they realize they should also say the latter? How about just being individualistic instead?
e why feminine women means “sex doll like". That seems to be a package 128cm love doll deal you are imposing on their thought, instead of what they actually th
